From: | Andrew Tettenborn <a.m.tettenborn@swansea.ac.uk> |
To: | obligations@uwo.ca |
Date: | 19/04/2018 12:01:33 UTC |
Subject: | illegality and tort |
More flesh put on Patel v Mirza in turning down a thoroughly
undeserving claimant. You ask me to set fire to your car to help
you bilk your insurance company: I do it, whereupon you report me
to the police for arson. Even though you knew I wasn't guilty of
arson, my action against you for malicious prosecution fails on
the basis that I thought I was participating in a conspiracy to
defraud. Quite right too. See Gujra
v Roath & Anor [2018] EWHC 854 (QB).
Andrew Tettenborn Professor of Commercial Law, Swansea University
Institute for International Shipping
and Trade Law
|
Andrew
Tettenborn Athro yn y Gyfraith Fasnachol, Prifysgol Abertawe
Sefydliad y
Gyfraith Llongau a Masnach Ryngwladol |
See us on Twitter: @swansea_dst
Read the IISTL Blog: iistl.wordpress.com
Read Andrew's other writing
here
Disclaimer: This email (including any attachments) is for the use of the intended recipient only and may contain confidential information and/or copyright material. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and delete this email and all copies from your system. Any unauthorized use, disclosure, reproduction, copying, distribution, or other form of unauthorized dissemination of the contents is expressly prohibited. |